Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(4): e239612, 2023 04 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2296319

ABSTRACT

Importance: Myopia is a global concern, but effective prevention measures remain limited. Premyopia is a refractive state in which children are at higher risk of myopia, meriting preventive interventions. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of a repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) intervention in preventing incident myopia among children with premyopia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a 12-month, parallel-group, school-based randomized clinical trial conducted in 10 primary schools in Shanghai, China. A total of 139 children with premyopia (defined as cycloplegic spherical equivalence refraction [SER] of -0.50 to 0.50 diopter [D] in the more myopic eye and having at least 1 parent with SER ≤-3.00 D) in grades 1 to 4 were enrolled between April 1, 2021, and June 30, 2021; the trial was completed August 31, 2022. Interventions: Children were randomly assigned to 2 groups after grade stratification. Children in the intervention group received RLRL therapy twice per day, 5 days per week, with each session lasting 3 minutes. The intervention was conducted at school during semesters and at home during winter and summer vacations. Children in the control group continued usual activities. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the 12-month incidence rate of myopia (defined as SER ≤-0.50 D). Secondary outcomes included the changes in SER, axial length, vision function, and optical coherence tomography scan results over 12 months. Data from the more myopic eyes were analyzed. Outcomes were analyzed by means of an intention-to-treat method and per-protocol method. The intention-to-treat analysis included participants in both groups at baseline, while the per-protocol analysis included participants in the control group and those in the intervention group who were able to continue the intervention without interruption by the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: There were 139 children (mean [SD] age, 8.3 [1.1] years; 71 boys [51.1%]) in the intervention group and 139 children (mean [SD] age, 8.3 [1.1] years; 68 boys [48.9%]) in the control group. The 12-month incidence of myopia was 40.8% (49 of 120) in the intervention group and 61.3% (68 of 111) in the control group, a relative 33.4% reduction in incidence. For children in the intervention group who did not have treatment interruption secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic, the incidence was 28.1% (9 of 32), a relative 54.1% reduction in incidence. The RLRL intervention significantly reduced the myopic shifts in terms of axial length and SER compared with the control group (mean [SD] axial length, 0.30 [0.27] mm vs 0.47 [0.25] mm; difference, 0.17 mm [95% CI, 0.11-0.23 mm]; mean [SD] SER, -0.35 [0.54] D vs -0.76 [0.60] D; difference, -0.41 D [95% CI, -0.56 to -0.26 D]). No visual acuity or structural damage was noted on optical coherence tomography scans in the intervention group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, RLRL therapy was a novel and effective intervention for myopia prevention, with good user acceptability and up to 54.1% reduction in incident myopia within 12 months among children with premyopia. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04825769.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Myopia , Male , Humans , Child , Pandemics , China/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Myopia/epidemiology , Myopia/prevention & control , Refraction, Ocular
2.
Cureus ; 15(2): e34623, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2261984

ABSTRACT

Psoriasis is a common skin condition worldwide. Moderate-to-severe disease is treated with biologic or non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. These include tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors, and IL-23 inhibitors. Case reports of inhibitors of TNF-a and IL-12p40 subunits causing interstitial pneumonia (IP) have been published in the literature, but no case of anti-IL-23p19 subunit biologics causing IP and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been reported before. We report a case of a patient with restrictive lung disease secondary to a body mass index of 36.54 kg/m2, obstructive sleep apnea, and psoriasis, who developed IP and ARDS presumed to be secondary to guselkumab, an anti-IL-23p19 subunit monoclonal antibody. He was on ustekinumab, an anti-IL-12/23p40 for the treatment of psoriasis, but was switched to guselkumab eight months before the presentation, and since then he had been complaining of progressive shortness of breath. He initially presented to the hospital after having drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) after being started on amoxicillin for a tooth infection. He was treated with high-dose intravenous steroids but developed progressive shortness of breath. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were added. An extensive infectious, autoimmune, and hypersensitivity work-up was undertaken, which returned negative. A bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage was performed, which revealed diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH). His lung imaging and oxygenation progressively got worse; hence, no lung biopsy was taken. He was intubated and required inhaled nitric oxide, but due to the lack of improvement, the family elected for comfort measures, and the patient was extubated and passed away. To our knowledge, this is the first case of an association between guselkumab, IP, ARDS, and DAH. Rare instances of DAH with DRESS have been reported before. Whether it was DRESS or guselkumab that caused DAH was uncertain in our patient. Clinicians should monitor for DAH and shortness of breath in patients on guselkumab so that more data can be obtained and studied in the future.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL